Russian collusion didn’t exactly pan out —but not for lack of trying by the Clinton campaign.
According to a new bombshell report, Hillary Clinton’s 2016 campaign paid an internet company to “infiltrate” Trump Tower servers and servers at the White House to try to tie President Trump to Russia. It didn’t work, of course – no evidence of collusion was ever “dug up.”
“The Friday filing from a Department of Justice prosecutor tasked with investigating the origins of the FBI’s Russian probe served to throw cold water on Democrats’ longstanding allegations of collusion…Special Counsel John Durham filed a motion related to potential conflicts of interests in connection with the case of Clinton campaign lawyer Michael Sussmann, who is charged with lying to the feds,” according to Fox News.
Sussmann, who delivered “evidence” to the feds —”proof” that Trump was in bed with Kremlin-linked banks, said he was absolutely not, 100% no way, ‘how could you even think that,’ ‘not in a million years,’ working for the Clinton campaign.
That appears to be a lie. But Sussmann says he was just being a “good citizen,” and is pleading not guilty.
Durham’s motion alleges Sussmann “had assembled and conveyed the allegations to the FBI on behalf of at least two specific clients, including a technology executive (Tech Executive 1) at a U.S.-based internet company (Internet Company 1) and the Clinton campaign,” according to the New York Post.
Records show Sussmann “repeatedly billed the Clinton Campaign for his work on the Russian Bank-1 allegations.” Sussmann’s accusations were wildly absurd and found to be baseless by Durham; one claim “demonstrated Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations.”
According to the NYP, “Durham said his office found ‘no support for these allegations,’ claiming the supposed evidence Sussmann provided was incomplete and skewed.
Former President Donald Trump released a statement, saying he was finally “vindicated.”
The document “provides indisputable evidence that my campaign and presidency were spied on by operatives paid by the Hillary Clinton Campaign in an effort to develop a completely fabricated connection to Russia,” Trump’s statement read.
“This is a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution.”
Columbia Journalism Review says between November 3rd 2020 (Election Day) and April 19th 2019, MSNBC devoted 32 percent of all news coverage to the Trump-Russia “scandal.” The New York Times and the Washington Post won Pulitzer Prizes for their coverage of the “scandal.”
All fake. A load of bull.
But the mainstream media will never let the narrative die. In their mind, there’s still a chance —a possibility — that something was missed somewhere. He must have played dirty.
Funny that it’s the other way around, no?
