On the first day of Joe Biden’s presidency in 2021, the Democrats and foreign governments in Mexico and Nicaragua both made significant moves that would unleash a torrent of illegal migrants into America. Biden immediately ended his predecessor’s “remain in Mexico” policy. Mexico passed a series of laws secretly that they knew would spur mass migration from Latin American countries to their south. The Marxist government of Nicaragua announced $50 flights from anywhere in the world to US-bound migrants from Asia and Africa.
If all of this sounds like an attack, it is. Peter Schweizer’s new bestselling book, The Invisible Coup: How American Elites and Foreign Powers Use Immigration as a Weapon, describes these and many other tactics used by foreign governments all over the world to use mass migration as a weapon.
Introducing him to his TBN show, Erick Stakelbeck says Schweizer’s book exposes as “a stealthy way of bringing a country to its knees.”
“As soon as Joe Biden was declared the winner of the 2020 election and, foreign governments immediately went to work to open up the spigots” of mass migration, Schweizer began., “People don’t realize it’s kind of a faucet. Days after Biden was declared the winner, the government of Mexico passed a series of laws, secretly, that they knew would spur mass migration to the US border. The Marxist government in Nicaragua said to would-be migrants, ‘Pay us $50 and you can fly to Nicaragua from anywhere in the world, and we will get you up to the Mexican border so you can get to the United States.’ And more than a million and a half people from Africa and Asia took them up on it.”
That’s a sampling of how governments in Mexico and elsewhere greeted Biden’s moves. But many Americans wonder why Biden would have done any of those things in the first place?
“Democrats discovered in the 1990s, under Bill Clinton that newly minted citizens vote about 85 percent for Democrats. They are a very reliable Democratic voting bloc,” Schweizer explained. “So, every American president of the Democratic persuasion in recent years has gotten rid of the requirements for getting new citizenship. They got rid of criminal background checks. They got rid of literacy requirements. They got rid of the civics tests that you’re supposed to pass, all because they wanted to mint as many new voters as possible.”
“The final thing to be said is it’s a big winner politically for Democrats, even if these immigrants don’t vote,” Schweizer pointed out, “because our Census is calculated based on the people that are present in a state, not on citizens. So, this has been a big boon to states like California because it gives them more congressional seats. It gives them more in the Electoral College. And that helps elect Democrats.”
Schweizer’s book debuted at #1 on the New York Times bestseller list and remains there for a third straight week. He had an hour-long meeting with President Trump and several Cabinet secretaries and has been asked to testify before two Senate committees in March on the book’s main findings.
Stakelbeck observes, “It seems, Peter, a similar stance by elites both in the U.S. and in Europe in welcoming international migrants who don’t share Western values. Is that how you see it? Is this intentional on the part of elites to transform Judeo-Christian Western civilization?
“There’s no question about it. In fact, they say so themselves. A lot of the big donors to NGOs, people like Bill Gates and George Soros, give to organizations that relocate refugees,” Schweizer responds. “These NGOs will say the reason they want mass migration is for the ‘transformative effects that it will have on the host country,’ namely on the United States or Europe.”
“I think we also have to acknowledge what our foreign adversaries say about this. What do China, the Muslim Brotherhood, or Mexico say about mass migration? In different ways, they all see it as a tool or a weapon to deploy against the West,” Schweizer says. “Clearly, they see it as a means not only for changing our civilization but also changing our politics in a direction that favors them and their agenda.”
Stakelbeck asks about Mexico’s role in this invisible coup.
“Mexican elites have said repeatedly and I quote dozens of them in the book, saying that mass migration to the United States is ‘a way of extending Mexican sovereignty into, into the United States to retake territories that they lost in the 19th century.’ Those are their words, not mine,” Schweizer says.
“And the way they accomplish that is by mass migration and by setting up political structures within our country. There are senior Mexican government officials who live in the United States in Arizona, California, Texas, Chicago. Their job is to represent Mexicans living in the United States in the Mexican Senate and in the Mexican Congress,” he adds.
There is more. “The UK and China have, respectfully, six and seven consulates in the United States. Mexico has 53, and those consulates are meddling in our politics in the United States, organizing anti-ICE protests, et cetera. They are actively moving inside of our country to advance their interests in what they call Greater Mexico,” he said.
